• Canada SPP Document 2

  • 911
    Trading Democracy for Corporate Rule Part one

    Dr. Michael Parenti: "Terrorism, Globalism and Conspiracy"

    Basic Registration

    For more information contact
    Red Deer - Mike Richard: Darkflame_Studios@hotmail.com
    Edmonton - Aaron Skaley: running_blind69@hotmail.com

    Feb 16: Protest for a Referendum on the SPP - Join & Organize!
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6512249067


    Connie Fogal - A voice of reason on the SPP
    The Canadian Action Party talks about the Security & Prosperity
    Partnership Summit in Montebello, 9/11 truth, and more....

    Join Connie Fogal, Leader Canadian Action Party

    More http://youtube.com/search=Canadian+Action+Party

    http://www.youtube.com/user/CanadaPetitions

    Former Canadian Defence Minister Paul Hellyer Questions 9/11
    The Honourable Paul Hellyer held the Canadian office equivalent to Secretary of Defense in the U.S., and was Deputy Prime Minister, Canadian equivalent to Vice President of the United States. He is also founder of the Canadian Action Party. Mr. Hellyer has serious doubts about the official explanation of the events of September 11th, 2001. In this clip, he is interviewed by Kyle Hence of www.911CitizensWatch.org on May 27, 2004 at the International 9-11 Citizen's Inquiry, held in Toronto, Canada.
    CANADIANS AGAINST
    THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
    Join 48,662 members
    1,000,000 Canadians Who Are AWAKE
    & Know We Are Being Lied To!!!
    Join 1,114 members
    1,000,000 Against War
    Join 1,901 members
    Support the Monks' protest in Burma
    Join 420,411 members

    Back to February 16th Protest For A Referendum

    Keep Reading To Learn More


    Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

    Connie Fogal says the SPP is  the "hostile takeover" of the apparatus of democratic government and an end to the "rule of law"
    There has been a kind of coup d'état over the government operations of Canada, U.S.A. and Mexico.

    http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/nau.html

    020807

    The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of Canada by Our Own Government
    http://www.paulgrignon.netfirms.com/CanadianActionParty/Metamorphosis1.html

    Just say no to the SPP: Five reasons to oppose
    the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

    Citizen's Guide to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)

    The State Of The USA ( Thread )
    Amerikan Lullaby

    Dismantling the Constitution of the USA
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=391_1178442968

    The three leaders of North America agreed to advance the agenda of
    the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
    http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1084

    The Outaouais Ottawa Stop SPP coalition consists of individuals and groups who have come together
    to mobilize for the Bush-Harper-Calderon meeting in Montebello, Quebec on August 18-21.
    http://www.stopspp.ca/stopspp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=18&Itemid=46

    North American Union Videos
    http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=nau

    The Secret Government
    http://www.converge.org.nz/pirm/frames/elite!f.htm

    What U.S. Presidents Have Said About Canada

    The ties between Canada and the United States are deep, although cultural and political differences sometimes lead to tensions. A shared border across 5000 miles of land and three oceans and the world's largest trading relationship provide a strong motivation to maintain good relations. Here is a sampling of what U.S. Presidents have said about Canada over the years.

    1. John Adams
      The Unanimous Voice of the Continent is "Canada must be ours; Quebec must be taken."

      ~1776. While serving as a delegate to the Continental Congress.
    2. Thomas Jefferson
      The acquisition of Canada this year, as far as the neighborhood of Quebec, will be a mere matter of marching, and will give us experience for the attack of Halifax the next, and the final expulsion of England from the American continent.

      ~1812.
    3. Franklin Roosevelt
      ...when I have been in Canada, I have never heard a Canadian refer to an American as a "foreigner." He is just an "American." And, in the same way, in the United States, Canadians are not "foreigners," they are "Canadians." That simple little distinction illustrates to me better than anything else the relationship between our two countries.

      ~1936. During a visit to Quebec City.
    4. Harry S. Truman
      Canadian-American relations for many years did not develop spontaneously. The example of accord provided by our two countries did not come about merely through the happy circumstance of geography. It is compounded of one part proximity and nine parts good will and common sense.

      ~1947. Address to Canadian Parliament.
    5. Dwight Eisenhower
      Our forms of government - though both cast in the democratic pattern - are greatly different. Indeed, sometimes it appears that many of our misunderstandings spring from an imperfect knowledge on the part of both of us of the dissimilarities in our forms of government.

      ~1958. Address to Canadian Parliament.
    6. John F. Kennedy
      Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us.

      ~1961. Address to Canadian Parliament.
    7. Ronald Reagan
      We are happy to be your neighbor. We want to remain your friend. We are determined to be your partner and we are intent on working closely with you in a spirit of co-operation.

      ~1981. Address to Canadian Parliament.
    8. Bill Clinton
      Canada has shown the world how to balance freedom with compassion and tradition with innovation, in your efforts to provide health care to all your citizens, to treat your senior citizens with the dignity and respect they deserve, to take on tough issues like the move afoot to outlaw automatic weapons designed for killing and not for hunting....

      ~1995. Address to Canadian House of Commons.
    9. George W. Bush
      I view the relationship with Canada as a vital relationship for the United States. The relationship, of course, is defined government-to-government. It's also defined people-to-people, and there's a lot of people in my country who respect Canada and have great relations with Canadians, and we intend to keep it that way.

      ~2006. In Cancun, Mexico after meeting with Stephen Harper.

    JUST SAY NO

    But the SPP is not all just high-level policy talk.
    It is already affecting our lives directly.

    In early 2007, an SPP priority to harmonize rules on pesticide residues
    resulted in Canada allowing higher levels of pesticides in the food we eat.

    The SPP’s goal of creating a North American no-fly list means that air travelers are being stopped from boarding their flights
    just because their names resemble one of almost half a million people U.S. officials implausibly consider an immediate threat.

    And the SPP’s plan for a fivefold increase in Alberta tar sands production makes it impossible
    for Canada to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    – putting everyone at increased risk from climate change.

    Clearly the public needs a much larger say in these kinds of decisions.


    Those pushing the SPP, be they senior government ministers, top bureaucrats or members of the business elite, have had it pretty easy so far. They shrug off criticism of the “partnership” by claiming that the SPP is about making this continent safer and more prosperous. But if the SPP were really about everyone’s security and everyone’s prosperity, our leaders would have included more than just a handful of North America’s richest CEOs in the discussion.

    US Military " Preparing" for Martial Law
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=61d_1186591878

    Long before 9/11 the Military has been training our soldiers how to
    shut down cities, confiscate guns, and put Americans in camps.

    George Bush Takes Over Canada--
    90% Of Canadians Unaware

    http://www.nexopia.com/forumviewthread.php?tid=4937539

    The United States is already guaranteed 60%
    of Canadian natural gas resources from NAFTA
    http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_virginia_0 70804_now_is_the_time_to_l.htm

    CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
    http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/index.html

    THIS IS NOT MY FLAG

    INFORM YOURSELF
    www.CanadianActionParty.Ca
    www.Canadians.Org

     

    CAP Recipe to Save Canada from a NAU Police State!

    Wendy Forrest (Toronto, ON) wrote on Aug 17, 2007 at 6:45 PM

    Ask what the other parties would do!
    The Canadian Action Party Would Immediately:

    1. Cancel the SPP
    2. End all participation in the North American Union
    3. Withdraw from the Bi-National Planning Agreement
    4. Dissolve the North American Competitiveness Council
    5. Give the six month's notice and Abrogate NAFTA

    (NAFTA was the first step of the NAU and must be cut off. NAFTA is not about trade.
    NAFTA is about globalization. There is nothing in NAFTA to renegotiate)

    6. Cancel all taxpayer funding for the working groups.
    7. Cancel all taxpayer funding for the Super NAFTA corridors into Canada.
    8. Restore independent Canadian military and police.
    9. Disarm the Canadian border guards.
    10. Eliminate Canada's No Fly list.
    11. End the Canadian airport security rules against shampoos and nail files etc
    12. End the sharing of airline passenger lists to foreign entities.
    13. Ban the practice of biometric identifiers for employees at airports and elsewhere
    14. Halt the Canadian introduction of Real ID cards, ie ,biometric identifiers in passports and driver's licences.
    15. Ban tracking devices in automobiles and cell phones and clothing.
    16. Revoke Canada's Anti Terrorist legislation.
    17. Ban the administration and advertising of the Gardasil vaccine on Canadian girls.
    18. Restore Canadian safety levels for pesticides on foods
    19. Convene a Royal Commission inquiry to examine and report on the expert evidence now in existence on what really happened on September 11, 2001
    20. Restore the use of our Bank of Canada to fund Canada interest free wherever possible instead of using private banks.
    21. Demand Parliament refuse to hear a delegation in September 2007 on the integration of North America.

    THE DEMISE OF CANADA IS NOT NEGOTIABLE, DISCUSSABLE, OR DEBATABLE .!!!!!!!!!!!!

    www.canadianactionparty.ca
    #385- 916 West Broadway Avenue
    Vancouver, BC V5Z 1K7
    Telephone: PST (604) 708 3372
    E-mail: info@canadianactionparty.ca
    http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=2455787297&topic=3190

     

    No to War * No to the SPP/NAU Let's go to Ottawa!

    Date: Aug 19-21, 2007

    No to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America On August 21 and 22, at Château Montebello, in the Outaouais region of Québec, the third meeting of the leaders of Canada, the United States and Mexico - Harper, Bush and Calderon - will take place to discuss the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). The Canadian Peace Alliance and Collectif Échec à la guerre denounce this partnership among the top business and political leaders of all three countries because it will not improve the security and prosperity of the people but will work against their aspirations. We call all peace supporting organizations and individuals to protest war and the SPP this August.

    The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was signed by Prime Minister Paul Martin and Presidents Vicente Fox and George W. Bush on March 23, 2005. Then came the second summit in Cancun, in March 2006, where Stephen Harper represented Canada. Media reporting of these meetings ignored the crucial issues at the heart of this "partnership": the accelerated extraction and delivery of Canadian oil and water resources to the US economy; a deepening of economic partnership with the US conditional to a war-driven foreign policy; the pretext of "national security" to justify the secrecy surrounding the precise nature of the discussions and the deals made. Guaranteeing and increasing the profits of the largest corporations In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, George W. Bush declared "[E]ither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists". That year, the only directive given to Paul Celluci, as he became US Ambassador to Canada, was to do whatever he could to bring about a major increase in Canadian military spending. During his term, he repeated relentlessly that, for the US, "security trumps trade". The message was clear: unless Canada adopted the same "security" agenda as the US, our trade relations would suffer. It is in this context that, in January 2003, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) launched its North-American Security and Prosperity Initiative, in which it takes a stand in favour of the "smart border", the secure flow of Canadian energy resources to the US, Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), a major increase in military spending and interoperability of Canadian and US armed forces.

    In April 2004, in a policy document entitled New Frontiers: Building a 21st Century Canada-United States Partnership in North-America, the CCCE wholeheartedly embraced Bush's credo: "The way that we and other countries respond to the relentless threat of terrorism and rogue states has vital implications for global economic growth just as it does for Canada’s future (...). In short, for Canada and for the world as a whole, economic security and physical security have become inseparable." In April 2003 and 2004, the CCCE held its spring meetings in Washington, inviting several US military and political leaders to participate. On to War ! Change in the international role of the Canadian Forces (CF) towards offensive operations in partnership with the US military has taken place gradually, over the last 15 years, without any public debate or awareness. In February 2005, it was made official in the Liberal government's budget, announcing the greatest increase in military spending since the end of World War II ($12.8 billion over five years). The following month, echoing the demands of the powerful Canadian corporate lobby and adopting their proposals almost to the word, the SPP was signed.

    The real significance of this "partnership" would become clearer over the following months. On April 19, 2005, the new International Policy Statement (IPS) of the Martin government announced its intention to increase regular forces by 5,000 members and reserves by another 3,000, as well as to double the rapid deployment capacity of the Canadian military for missions abroad. And, in July 2005, it was announced that the Canadian intervention in Afghanistan would move from Kabul to Kandahar and that, starting in February 2006, an extra 1,400 soldiers would be sent to that area. This news was accompanied by declarations by the new Chief of Defence Staff, Rick Hillier, rejoicing at the thought of hunting down terrorist "scumbags" and to see the Canadian Forces finally doing their real job of being "able to kill people".

    Anti-democratic policies Granting the wishes of Canada's largest corporations - those who also benefit the most from military and "security" contracts - the Government of Canada has forced on the people a warmaking foreign policy that the majority continues to reject. Furthermore, as was revealed a few months ago, in the name of that same partnership, the goal of increasing fivefold the production of oil in the Alberta tar sands by 2030 has been decided. This makes even more ludicrous the recent Conservative government statements of seriously wanting to address the issue of greenhouse gases and to follow the spirit of the Kyoto Protocol. On this issue, the gap between government policies and the will of the people is even more obvious. This third SPP summit will bring together a US president whose policies are backed by hardly a quarter of his own people, a Mexican president whose election is highly disputed, and a Canadian Prime Minister heading a minority government. The deals they will make in Montebello, with no parliamentary debate or public discussion, will have no legitimacy. The Canadian Peace Alliance and Collectif Échec à la Guerre therefore call on the people of Québec and Canada to reaffirm their opposition to the warmongering, anti-environmental and anti-democratic policies of the Security and Prosperity Partnership and to protest the SPP summit. No to the wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan! No to the accelerated destruction of our planet! No to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America! - - - - - - - - - -

    More Information: http://www.acp-cpa.ca/en/index.html

     

    TREASON!

    STOP THE SPP AND THE NAU

    The SPP is a treasonous metamorphosis  of our federal and provincial government bureaucracies into formal instruments to implement the agenda of  the shadow government - the military/industrial/financial complex exemplified by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives who in turn are dominated by the U.S Council on Foreign Relations, and the US military apparatus.  The S.P.P. has created the competitiveness council (10 to 16 people from industry and academe unelected by citizens, unaccountable to citizens, unrepresentative of citizens) in each of Canada, U.S.A., and Mexico. They meet with our Prime Minister and the two Presidents. They actively direct the restructuring of the civil service apparatus and governance of Canada, U.S., and Mexico away from instruments serving the public interest and nationhood, and into tools to serve the power and greed of the industrial, financial, military complex. This Competitiveness Council will be at Montebello directing  the three leaders in August, 2007  finalizing the last steps of the NAU.

    elite.htm

      THE SECRET GOVERNMENT

    A small number of extremely wealthy people, descendants of wealthy families in Europe and the U.S, own a major part of the material wealth of the world. This power is concentrated in London which is the centre of the world banking system. The control they exercise is kept within the original families and passed down from generation to generation. They are highly organised, operating in secret through a web of 'private' organisations.

    This group is known as the Global Elite.

    Their wealth is accumulating on a compound basis. They determine the course of history, through virtual control of the world economy.

    They are working to a 'grand plan' which is now well-advanced.

    The common reaction of people when first hearing of the global elite and their operations is one of disbelief and a refusal to give the claims any credibility as it appears so outrageous. But during the last few years there has been an increasing volume of books, articles and essays, all with the same story. All are based on well-documented research. The information revealed is consistent with the events of recent history, leaving no room for doubt. It is the "New World Order" taking shape - the Global Elite strategy.

    For our purposes. the concentration of control over financial resources started with the Industrial Revolution. The 18th century saw the emergence and rapid rise of the House of Rothschild - the largest and most powerful financial empire - built on money embezzled by Mayer Amschel Bauer (later Rothschild) from William IV, who had stolen it from the soldiers he had hired out to the British government to fight Napoleon's armies. Rothschild sent the money to England, bought vast quantities of gold from the East Indian Company, used this to finance the Duke of Wellington's exploits and, working through the Brotherhood network, manipulated governments and created wars and revolutions. He lent money to both sides of the conflicts in what became a standard practice of the banking elite. Rothschild's influence can hardly be overstated, for it was the precursor of today's vast transnational corporations and banking empires which have extended their control to the four corners of Earth in the long-term agenda of the Brotherhood. As Historian John Reeves puts it:

    Little could Mayer Amschel have anticipated that his sons would in after years come to exercise such an unbounded sway that the peace of nations would depend upon their nod; that the powerful control they exercised on the European money markets would enable them to pose as the arbiters of peace and war, since they could at their pleasure withhold or furnish the percuniary [sic] means required to carry on a campaign.

    But this, incredible as it may seem, was what their vast influence, combined with their enormous wealth and unlimited credit, enabled them to do, for no firms existed strong enough to oppose them for any length of time, or rash enough to take up a business which the Rothschilds had refused. To reach this exulted position, Mayer Amschel and his sons required the cooperation of the states, but, when once he had climbed over their banks and reached the height of his ambition, he was independent of all aid and could act with the greatest freedom, whilst the states remained in a suppliant attitude at his feet.

    The Rothschild approach was reportedly summed up by Mayer Amschel himself: "Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes the laws." When Rothschild's son Nathan died, his eldest son, Lionel, took over, making massive loans to the British and American governments and others, including some $80 million to Britain to finance the Crimea War. Lionel was succeeded by the second Nathan, the first Lord Rothschild, who took his seat in the House of Lords in 1885. He became the governor of the Bank of England (the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street) with unlimited power over the world's financial system. That power has not diminished - far from it - it has simply expanded with new empires like that of Morgan and Rockefeller, so that in the closing decade of this century the power and the control of the world's financial system behind its many 'fronts' is completely in the hands of the Global Elite and is enormous.

    But to return to the start of the Industrial Revolution. At its beginning, the ruling powers in Great Britain embarked on one of the most sustained efforts to destroy community life ever undertaken. From 1770 to 1830 some 3,280 enclosure bills were passed putting into private hands for private gain more than six million acres of commonly-held lands. By 1830 not a single country had more than three percent of its land open to public use. According to historian George Sturt:

    To the enclosure of the commons more than to any other cause, may be traced all the changes which have subsequently passed over the village. It was like knocking the keystone out of an arch.

    This control of finite resources, and with it the diminution of democracy, was well advanced by 1901 when Morgan and Rockefeller, who headed the two main financial groups in America, amalgamated 112 corporate directorates, combining $22.2 billion in assets - a massive sum in those days. In 1910 eight financiers, including the host, met in absolute secrecy at the private hunting club of J.P Morgan - the Jekyll Island Club off the coast of Georgia - "to shoot ducks". News of this meeting did not leak for six years, but from then on snippets of information were made public. For example, on 18 January 1920, The New York Times made a most revealing statement about the Federal Reserve System, the basic plan for which those secretive bankers had proceeded to draft back in 1910: "The Federal Reserve is the fount of credit, not of capital." This meant that Reserve notes, instead of being backed by precious metal or other suitable commodity which would provide capital funds for the betterment of industry and commerce, are backed by paper loaned at interest.

    On 25 July 1921, Senator Owen stated in the same paper: "The Federal Reserve Board is the most gigantic financial power in the world. Instead of using this great power as the Federal Reserve Act intended that it should, the board ....delegated this power to the banks,...." In 1931 on 3 May, when commenting on the death of one of J.P Morgan's closest associates, The New York Times remarked: "One-sixth of the total wealth of the world was represented by members of the Jekyll Island Club." This reference was to just those men who were part of Morgan's group and members of his Club. It excluded the Rockefeller group and the European financiers. Among those "duck shooters" present back in November 1910 were Benjamin Strong, head of J.P Morgan's Bankers Trust Company and from 1914 till his death in 1928 Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank, and Paul Warburg, who not knowing one end of a gun from the other had carried a borrowed shotgun onto the train that night at Hoboken, New Jersey. Warburg, who had exceptionally powerful banking connections in New York, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands, was the real power behind the Federal Reserve throne. His brother Max was head of the German Secret Service during World War I.

    J.P Morgan and his "duck shooters" proceeded to draft the basic plan for the Federal Reserve System with five objectives:

    • Stop the growing competition from the nation's newer banks.
    • Obtain a franchise to create money out of nothing, for the purpose of lending.
    • Get control of the reserves of all the banks.
    • Get the taxpayer to pick up the cartel's inevitable losses.
    • Convince Congress that the purpose of the FRS was to protect the public.

    It succeeded brilliantly. As Anthony Sutton remarks about one of the more blatant scams in history: "The Federal Reserve System is a legal private monopoly of the money supply operated for the benefit of the few under the guise of protecting and promoting the public interest."

    Space does not permit any exploration of the secret machinations and malfeasance, including the Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression, organised by Montague Norman, Governor of the Bank of England from 1916 to 1944, and Benjamin Strong, with a little help from their friends. Nor is there room to examine the wider implications of the actions of these Robber Barons and their support for Germany in the First World War (Nurse Edith Cavell was shot by the Germans upon the insistence of the British authorities for her "inconvenient" exposure that "Belgian Relief" supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed its army), and for Hitler's subsequent rise to power.

    Prior to assuming real power, Montague Norman had had a nervous breakdown in 1912 and, as was fashionable, had gone to Switzerland to be treated by Jung.

    When people of this class are stricken by guilt feelings while plotting world wars and economic depressions which will bring misery, suffering and death to millions of the world's inhabitants; they sometimes have qualms. These qualms are jeered at by their peers as "a failure of nerve". After a bout with their psychiatrists, they return to their work with renewed gusto, with no further digression of pity for "the little people" who are to be their victims.

    It should be noted, according to Eustace Mullins, that the same all-powerful names, the same closed shop responsible for the foundation of the Federal Reserve System, still manage the world's closely interlinked finances, "with profits for themselves but with disastrous results for everyone else".

    Next we jump to Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, 1944, and the first United Nations International Monetary Conference. It hammered out the final agreement for the post-war New World Order under which in due course there would be a further massive shift in power out of the hands of nation states and democratic governments and into the hands of banks and transnational corporations. William Pitt, more than two centuries ago, summarised what has taken place: "Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it" - a dictum which is more generally known from Lord Acton's statement of 1887; "power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

    The Bretton Woods conference also structured Anglo-American hegemony over world oil supplies and led to the creation of the all-powerful International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) which, under the control of the US Federal Reserve System, since then, deliberately and ruthlessly, have put most of the so-called Third World into extreme debt. It has been said that the WB and IMF "have arguably done more harm to more people than any other non-military institutions in history." As Jesse Jackson put it in 1993: "They no longer use bullets and ropes. They use the World Bank and the IMF." Between 1982 and 1990, debtor countries paid back more than $1,300 billion but began the nineties 61 percent more in debt than they were in 1992. Sub-Saharan African debt alone increased by 113 percent." In 1993, for every one pound given in aid, rich nations took back 3 pounds in debt payments. Nigerian writer and environmentalist, Ken Saro-Wiwa, roundly condemned the World Bank's position:

    The World Bank has to accept that its real instrument of torture is its insistence on growth, its economic theorising at the expense of human welfare...

    The sooner debtor nations realise the political nature of the World Bank, the sooner they will be able to face the bogus economic theories of the Bank with an equivalent weapon -people's power.

    Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogoni activists were hanged on 10 November 1995 by Nigeria's dictator, General Abacha. In case the message is not clear, the 1988 registration of former senior IMF economist Davison Budhoo, should leave no doubt. Budhoo resigned in disgust, hoping, he said, to "wash my hands of the blood of millions of poor and starving people."

    The IMF was never designed to help the Third World or end poverty. It was established by the Bretton Woods conference of 1944 to restore economic and financial order to the Western world. There was no element of compassion for humanity in its formulation. The Fund's aim is first and foremost to assure the interests of developed countries. We make or break human life every day of every year as probably no other force has ever done in the past or will ever do again.

    Coupled with these two exceptionally powerful organisations are the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), formulated shortly after the WB and IMF, and finally signed in 1993, and the new World Trade Organisation (WTO) of 1995. This quadruplet is now able to enforce throughout the world the doctrine of corporate libertarianism - a transnational corporate bill of rights - and God help any country that gets in the way.

    The Secret Agenda

    David Icke's book "...and the Truth Shall Set You Free" lists a summary of the basic themes of the Elite's plan following World War II:

    • To introduce a world authority called the United Nations (with associated bodies like the World Health Organisation), which could evolve into a world government with powers to control the lives of everyone on the planet.
    • To continue to cause conflicts across the world and to use the fear of the Soviet Union to massively increase spending on nuclear weapons and 'conventional' weapons, thus adding to the terror of nuclear war and demands for global security. To set up an American-European defence alliance (which was called the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)) and a United Nations 'peace'keeping force, which, through the engineering of conflicts, would eventually be fused together to form the world army.
    • To create three 'free trade' regions in Europe, the Americas, and Asia, which would be sold to people initially as merely economic groupings. Gradually, however, these would be evolved into a centralised political unions, with one central bank and one currency. These would be stepping-stones to the introduction of the same institutions on a global scale. The European Economic Community, now the European Union, was the first of these, but the other two are now underway also.
    • To advance the control of public opinion and to research and expand the understanding of how to manipulate the human psyche, individually and collectively. Today this agenda includes the microchipping of people and their permanent connection to a global computer.
    • To create a welfare state while destroying alternatives to the economic system and, when the desired dependency had been achieved, to dismantle that state welfare support, so creating a vast underclass without help or hope.
    • To make fantastic amounts of money in the course of realising all these ambitions via the Elite-controlled companies and banks.
    • To continually add to the debt burden of people, business, and state, thus increasing the control exerted over them.

    The approach which was followed to hoodwink public thinking was painfully predictable, but highly effective: Discredit the nation state. This was laid out during the War by the German economist and refugee, Hans Heymann, who produced his Plan for Permanent Peace using funds given by... the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    3